Music Is My Boyfriend

Apple has a history of being ultra successful with their marketing campaigns here is the latest:

Sex or Humor?

Which is more effective?

Sex



Humor

Has anyone seen the Bahamavention Ads?

I love these ads because I believe they present the value proposition and the are a great ad campaign. But where the ad lacks is in its circulation. Many people have never seen the commercials nor do they remember them.

The Orbit Commercials

I love the Orbit "Dirty Mouth" commercials I think they are hilarious and very memorable. My favorite is the cheating husband one featured below



Though this a good ad it doesn't really prompt the customer to stop using their preferred to switch to Orbit. I think Orbit should keep their ad campaign but better deliver their value proposition. They need to display how there products a different from the competitors.

The Future of American Brands

With the expansion of countries like India and China in the marketplace it has become increasingly difficult for American companies to prosper amongst all its competition. Is it possible for these brands to differentiate themselves and still be American bred? Complaints that many Americans have is about the outsourcing of many jobs today in America. With jobs being outsourced it allows many brands to keep their prices affordable. In the electronics and car industry it provides a level of competence that is associated with the manufacturing done overseas as compared to America. The result of the expansion of these countries is the decline of the American economy. In the future many of the brands associated with America will become less and less American as all the parts are being outsourced from foreign countries. How much does the American value American made products? Many of us are not going to sacrifice our hard earned dollars to support American manufacturers unless it is of some benefit to us. Is this where the government should intervene? Should the American government make it increasingly difficult for companies to outsource like by adding excise taxes and other charges to companies that choose to, and grant incentives like tax write-offs for labor to those that don't. If this happened it could possibly raise the value and consumption of American made products and also allow companies to better regulate the production of the products being made. It would also raise the value of the American dollar and provide more jobs in the workforce.

PR Damage control

In class while discussing PR we briefly touched on major PR crisis that companies have faced, such as the cyanide in Tylenol and the syringes in Pepsi. This got me to thinking, how does a PR firm go about cleaning up these types of messes? Since cases like these can have a major impact on brand image it is imperative that companies act swiftly in managing these crises. The cyanide in Tylenol capsules crisis occurred in the fall of 1982. In this case seven people in the Chicago area were reported dead after taking Tylenol Extra Strength capsules. This was every company’s nightmare. Not only were the costumers killed by the product, the problem occurred because of product tapering after the product was on the self. Though Tylenol was not directly at fault for the deaths it scared people from using Tylenol. Before this incident Tylenol controlled 37% of its market share but after news of the deaths began to spread Tylenol's market share plummeted to only 7%. So what does a company do once involved in a crisis of this size? In the case of Tylenol they took several steps to control the crisis and repair brand image. First off McNeil Consumer Products, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, did an immediate product recall across the entire country. This recall amounted to about 31 million bottles, and a loss of more than $100 million dollars. They also halted all advertisement for the product. After the product was removed from the market and the crisis was over the company had to find away to reintroduce the product and restore their brand image. With the reintroduction of the product Tylenol took several steps to ensure that the product would now be tamper proof. When the product returned to the shelves it became the first company to comply with the new Food and Drug Administration mandate on tamper-resistant packaging. Tylenol also began promoting caplets, which are more tamper resistant. Tylenol also offered coupons and a price reductions to prompt consumers to start buying the product. Obviously Tylenol was successful in managing this PR crisis because it is still today one of the leading pain killers on the market. A second example of a PR disaster is the subway ads that were tied to the documentary super size me. In this case the disaster did not come from a situation that was out of the company’s hands, but instead was self induced by subways poor marketing decisions and inter company communication. This slip up began when subways German franchises decided it would be a good idea to do a cross promotion with the distributor of "Super Size Me." Seems like a good idea, right? People are aware that fast food can be fattening and people are aware of the current obesity problem in America. Unfortunately the ad did little to promote subways healthy food options and instead did more damage than good by being seen as incredibly offensive. In the ads there where cartoon images depicting hamburgers crashing into New York's World Trade Center and an overweight Lady Liberty. It’s not hard to see how these images would be offensive to Americans as well as non Americans. 9/11 was a tremendous tragedy and the image of hamburgers crashing into the world trade center seems like a rather twisted joke. I’m not sure who thought this was a good idea but it is clear that there was poor inter company communication at work here. Had the German franchises communicated properly with the subway headquarters here in the U.S. prior to releasing the ads I’m sure the ads would have been revised. So how did subway deal with this major foe pa? Subway had its Amsterdam office and German franchisees recall the promotion, and Subway PR manager Kevin Kane apologized from corporate headquarters on behalf of Subway's German franchisees. In my opinion that’s all subway could have done. This PR incident was in no way as huge as the Tylenol incident, but it goes to show that even minor marketing slip ups need to be managed quickly and efficiently in order to protect brand image. In both these cases the PR representatives had to act quickly in order to control the situation and protect the company from further damage.

The news we get on television and the news we get at websites such as BBC and New York Times is very different. First of all there is the fast paced nature of television. With news programs on TV they may be reporting on the same stories as what you would find at these websites, but you are not getting nearly the depth you get when reading the news on these sites. Since these shows have a limited amount of time, they cannot spend as much time on each story. There is also the issue of ratings. Since Television news shows cannot report on every story, they have to pick and choose stories that will give them the best ratings. This means that news programs may often go with the story that has the most mass appeal. This often leaves many important pieces of news with only a little air time, or none at all. News channels can also be very biased. Take for example Fox news. Fox news has for many years gotten a bad rep for being very skewed on the news it chooses to show, and how it is presented. Another issue affecting these programs is that many American news programs choose to focus more on American news only. Only a small portion of the program is devoted to world news. This leaves many Americans who get there news solely from these programs left in the dark about events happening outside the country. Of course most of these issues are directed more at news programs such as Good Morning America and ABC primtime news, not news networks such as CNN and C-Span, though some of the same issues can plague these news outlets as well.

Unforgivable Ads

I heard all the uproar over P. Diddy's ads for his latest fragrance Unforgivable and assumed the ads were going to be gross and extremely appalling. I believe the ads did deliver those emotions but it failed to really sell the fragrance. All the glamorization of sex and infidelity failed to highlight the fragrance. Though this is true I don't believe it will hinder consumers from going and purchasing the fragrance. The attention the ad received from the uproar and upset has not stopped some channels from playing the ads. I have seen the ads on several different stations recently. The oversexualization of this country is appalling, and I believe that creative minds are stifled if they believe the only avenue to sell a product to today's consumer is through sex. I will not buy the fragrance for a loved one, but I know many others would.

Is advertising overwhelming?

These days one cannot go through their daily lives with out being bombarded with millions of advertisements. From the moment we wake up our senses are literally overrun with advertisements. Think about it. If you are someone you watches he local news when you wake up in the morning, think about how many ads you see during that programming. Or if you’re someone that prefers to read the paper in the morning you are still seeing lots of ads. Then think about your commute to work or school. Think of all the billboards you see, and of course don’t forget about the ads on the radio. If you continue to think about your daily routine and all the ads you encounter you will probably realize that you are seeing thousands upon thousands of adds everyday just doing your regular activities. But is this such a bad thing? I mean maybe all this advertising does contribute do the average America’s huge debt problem, but can you picture a world without advertising? In today’s world the average amount of credit card debt is close to $10,000 per household. That’s a lot. And it seems very discouraging when day in and day out Americans are constantly over run with all theses cleaver adds urging them to spend more and tempting them with the never ending promise that if you had this one item life would be so much better. But then if you stop and think about what the world would be like without advertising it would not be a pretty picture. Let’s start back at the beginning of the day and suppose that there is no advertising. There would be no more watching the local news in the morning because the average America could not afford to watch television without advertising. The paper to would be out of the question. The commute to work would also change. Since all the billboards help fund roads, there might not be any without them. And of course radio to would also be far too expensive for the average American to afford. So with out advertising think of all the extra money we would be spending for entertainment such as radio or television. I think the average American would still have just as much credit card debt because they would be spending so much more for entertainment. Though advertising can sometimes seem excessive and overwhelming I would prefer to never have to experience a world without it.

Avataars

Overall I think the Avatar is a cute idea, but more for a younger crowd. It was fun to create the avatar, but I think the clothing selection needs improvement. I didn’t find very many appealing options with the cloths and the colors and styles of the cloths just seems like they would appeal to younger people more than my age group. Though it was fun to create the avatar, I don't think I would ever use it. I don’t really understand what it is for. I know that you use it when using yahoo messenger, but I don't use yahoo messenger. I did think it was a cute idea however that you can change the avatar’s mood and their facial expression changes. I think younger kids would really enjoy using the Avatar, but I feel that people my age wouldn’t really see its purpose.

The Avatar

I think the Yahoo! Avatars are really cute. I have had a Yahoo! account for a long time, but actually today was the first time I created an Avatar because I thought it was a little silly. Surprisingly it was fun for me. I think it would have a been a little better if there was a slighter larger range of skin colors as an ethnic person I did not find a shade that I felt reflected my complexion. When choosing the clothing I think it would be more entertaining if the clothing was placed in a retail setting that had the different garment pieces in sections. People could dress their Avatar in lots of different selections in a dressing room similar to what is seen on the H&M website. Your favorite selections could then be stored in your personal closet that one could refer to often when they chose and wanted to change the outfit of their Avatar. These changes would make the Avatar more hands on and make someone return often to come back often to change the look of their Avatar.

Seven Jeans

In class we have been talking about subjects like brand equity and Vera Wang's line at Kohl's. I have been noticing another brand that has lowered its prices and brand identity to reach a new market and that is Seven jeans. These jeans are now being sold at Kohl's also when I first noticed this I thought maybe that this is okay and it can have a blue label like Ralph Lauren's Polo line or Armani Exchange. The difference is that even though these companies also have blue labels they have been able to retain a level of exclusivity. Seven Jeans does not seem as though there are as successful. Ralph Lauren and Armani are brands that have been around for years and have a faithful consumer base and they also have faithful consumers who though they cannot afford wish they could. Today I went to Ross and they had a pair of Seven jeans for 19.99. I found this to be astonishing. Suddenly I no longer liked the jeans even though they were cute. I am someone who appreciates feeling like I have something that the average person may not. Selling jeans at a major discounter like Ross makes the company much less exclusive. I wonder what the discounted blue label of Seven jeans will do to the overall perception of its brand? I also wonder why I wasn't as disgusted when I saw a cable Polo sweater for 24.99.

Taking advertising too seriously

A few Days ago in class we were discussing ethical advertising. While I do believe it is wrong to advertise overly sexual clothing, such as under wear that says eye candy and things of that nature, to children I think sometimes people simply take advertising too seriously. There is an ad that old navy is currently running that many seem to be taking offense to. The ad is for the new old navy jeans called diva, sweetheart, and flirt. The supposed offensive material was the song playing in the background. The song was a rendition of “Blue Alert” by Madeline Peyroux. Some people apparently felt the lyrics “she said no and no again” promoted sexual assault. But personally I feel that is a stretch. The song never indicates directly what she is saying no to. Also the action being shown also does not indicate any type of sexual assault. None of the women in the ad are even being pursued by men. The first girl, the “Diva”, is the only woman even shown with a man during the ad, and she is receiving a foot message, which does not in any way represent assault. Also at the end of the ad the women all leave together, not with men. Even though the class was told prior to viewing the ad that it was offensive, no one even identified that the song was the offensive material. I think that the song choice had nothing to do with the lyrics “she said no and n0 again”, but had more to do with how the song fit the theme of the commercial. The ad showed the three women in an urban setting and I feel the music promoted the glamorous yet laid back feel the ad was trying to convey. Saying this ad is offensive is simply just taking it too far.

The Gap has Fallen

In class on yesterday we talked about the Gap and how the company's brand equity has been on the steady decline in the past couple of years. We credited their continued demise to the fact that their core customer the middle class consumer is thinning out and becoming non existent. I agree that their target customer may becoming small, but there are some ways that the company could improve its products in order to regain a better position in the marketplace.

The first improvement I believe the Gap could make is to establish differentiation between itself and it's competitors in the marketplace. There have been many times when I have found an identical garment in Old Navy and the Gap. The Gap needs to look at what their competitors are doing well, stores such as Express and The Limited. The stores sell more of a lifestyle geared to the middle class consumer. Though their target price point is middle class, consumers of many economic classes are drawn to their products because they feel the products are differentiated from those of other retailers and portrays a lifestyle they wish to attain. The Gap has failed to differentiate themselves at all.

I believe that the Gap could become much more of a success if they try to differentiate their products with maybe a more fashion forward design. They also could benefit by promoting a certain lifestyle to be associated with the consumer. Portraying exactly whom they choose to target. With these improvements I think that the Gap will have a long future as the flagship store of its company.

Sarah Jessica Parker and the Low end trend

In Class we have been discussing big name designers who are choosing to make lower end lines for various department and chain stores. I think this is a very interesting phenomenon in the fashion world today. Though this down market trend can be a huge success, i.e. Karl Lagerfeld and H & M, these designers can also ruin their brand image and be considered a sale outs such as Isaac Mizrahi for target. There is also a trend in the market today of big name celebrities creating their own lines such as Beyonce Knowles and her line House of Dereon and Justine Timberlake and his line William Rast. These lines are generally very pricy and exclusive. But there are also big name celebrities that are also choosing to market their lines at a lower price point. One big name celebrity that is jumping on this down market trend is Sarah Jessica Parker. Sarah Jessica Parker is known for her fashion forward and quirky style from the hit show Sex and the City. Through out the 6 year span of the show Sarah Jessica Parker grew to be a fashion icon. In early July of 2007 Sarah Jessica Parker debuted her new line, Bitten, at Steve and Berry stores around the country. The price point is very low, most items range from $10 to $20 and the ads stated thing such as “Fashion is not a luxury, it’s a right” and “A sweater shouldn’t cost more than your groceries”. I think this was clever and really targets the early 20’s crowd, who may love fashion but may also not have a lot of extra cash. I read about Bitten in a Marie Claire article and wanted to find out more. I had never herd of a Steve and Berry’s so I went online to see if there were any stores in the area and as it turns out there was a store only 20 minutes from where I live. I wasn’t very impressed with the store itself. It reminded me of the clothing section of Wal-Mart, with its cheep looking hard wood flooring and poor display. But I was pleasantly surprised by the Sarah Jessica Parker line. Jeans were only $15 and tops were around $10. There was also a large selection of accessories including bags, shoes, and jewelry. Also the products seemed to be of a high quality for such a low price point. Overall I think the Sara Jessica Parker line will be a huge success. The low price point trend for Big name designers and celebrities can be a hit or miss, but for Sarah Jessica Parker I think she hit this one out of the park.

The First One: Such An Emphasis on Sex

Mary Jones
August 22

Why do companies feel the need to portray sex so often in their advertising? Is it effective and if so why does society have such a fixation on sexuality? The taboo that sexuality is in the American society has also caused our culture to glamorize it. This is an interesting phenomenon of how the forbidden always seems to be the most enticing due to the rebelliousness of human nature. I wonder does the saturation in todays media of sexual acts have a direct relation to the rise in teenage pregnancies and the transmission of STDs. I think that it would shows some expertise if a company was able to find another method to attract consumers to its products or services.